ED smack down: Waste vs. savings in my local EDs!
Wednesday, May 20th, 2009In the last two weeks I have spent time at two completely different hospital system, and by default, spent a lot of time in their EDs. One ED is efficient, the other over orders and under delivers, and easily becomes overwhelmed. So what is the difference?
First, the two EDs serve two very different populations. One is the go to hospital for a large HMO in the area. The other is a large, urban trauma center, serving a significant population of the homeless as well as weekend warriors that are getting fancy hip replacements. Guess which one is more efficient and effective?
If you guessed the HMO hospital, you guessed wrong. The large sprawling hospital with “we take ‘em all” attitude is more efficient at healing and dealing with patients. They don’t have a fancy EMR, they don’t have smarter docs, or better nurses, or fancier equipment. (It’s actually kind of an arm pit of an ED.) What they have is a culture where patients are fully worked up and all avenues are explored before a patient is admitted. Let’s call this ED “A” (for armpit!) and the second ED at the fancy HMO ED “F” (for fancy.)
Differences:
ED A values disposition, looking at hospital admission as a last option. This is based on the fact that with such a significant homeless population, hospital A would go out of business if ED A admitted everything.
ED F, on the other hand, values through put. ED F will get paid on every patient they see, and the hospital will get paid by the HMO for every patient that is admitted. There is no incentive to not admit patients. Rather, there is incentive to clear the decks of the ED and move patients through to the hospital.
ED A must complete work ups so they can dispo patients effectively. ED F frequently will call and say, “Mr. Oldtimer can’t walk, and I don’t know why, so he needs to come in.” Work ups stop as soon as patient is admitted because, for ED F, it is easier just to admit patients than work them up and attempt a disposition.
Hospital A has a powerful hospitalist group that has a lot of clout. The hospitalist group and hospital don’t want to admit patients for social reasons. Again, finances play a large part in this culture of disposition. Hospital F has a hospitalist group that has no clout, and is viewed as a baby sitting service by the ED. ED A will hear about it from the hospitalist group if work ups are incomplete. ED F will hear nothing.
So, if you are looking for an efficient, effective ED group, don’t look at the fancy ED with the fancy EMR and state of the art equipment. Look at the ED group who understands that a hospital is not a hotel, and that it is for sick people only. This is how to save health care dollars!